THE STRATEGY AND COHERENCE OF READING TEXTS IN OPTIMIZING THE CHILD AWARENESS ON SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT
STRATEGI DAN KEUTUHAN TEKS BACAAN DALAM MENGOPTIMALKAN KEPEDULIAN ANAK TERHADAP LINGKUNGAN SOSIAL
Keywords:
Social Function, Genre, Literacy, TextAbstract
English
Each text genre has their own social function to fulfill the purpose of reading activities, therefore texts serve as an inseparable medium of learning in schools. This study explores the function and purposes of texts in correlation of recent social issues in the society. The data includes textbooks from the most recent curriculum. The data was analyzed into some phases of each genre based on Islamic perspectives. Social literacy is essentially needed since early ages of the children to equip them with the knowledge of socializing. In this case, texts are expected to be internalized by the children in their surrounding social environment. Besides exploring the text genres, this study also formulates some suggestions for the development of texts as well as for the teachers who communicate the content of the texts to the students.
Indonesia
Setiap genre teks memiliki fungsi sosialnya masing-masing untuk memenuhi tujuan dari aktifitas membaca. Oleh karena itu, teks menjadi media pembelajaran yang tidak bisa dipisahkan dari kegiatan belajar di sekolah. Berkaitan dengan fungsi dan tujuan dari teks yang lebih luas, penulis mengaitkannya dengan permasalahan sosial terkini di masyarakat dengan sumber data dari buku kurikulum terbaru. Literasi sosial diperlukan sejak dini untuk memberikan bekal pengetahuan bermasyarakat sehingga manfaat teks diharapkan dapat diinternalisasikan oleh anak-anak terhadap lingkungan sosial di sekitarnya. Selain mengeksplorasi genre teks pada sumber data, penulis juga berusaha memberikan saran pengembangan bagi teks maupun kepada guru sebagai pihak yang berperan penting sebagai penghubung berbagai aspek yang dibawa teks kepada para siswanya. Penulis memperoleh temuan tersebut melalui analisis pentahapan dari setiap genre dan sudut pandang Islami.
Downloads
References
Baynham, Mike, Mastin Prinsloo, eds. 2009. The Future of Literacy Studies. New York: Palgrave Mac Millan. BBC Online. 2016. “Anak-Anak Muda Indonesia Makin Radikal.†Februari 18.www.bbc.com/indonesia/berita_indonesia/ 2 0 1 6 / 0 2 /160218_indonesia_radikalisme_anak_muda.
Berman, Ruth A. 2004. “Introduction: Developing Discourse Stance in Different Text Types and Language.†Elsevier: Journal of Pragmatic 34: 105-124.
Chamberlain, Mary, and Paul Thompson. 1998. Narrative and Genre. London: Routledge.
Christie, Frances. 2002. Classroom Discourse Analysis: A Functional Perspective. London: Continuum.
Cope, B, and M. Kalantzis. 1993. The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. New York: The Falmer Press.
Coulmas, Florian. 2013. Writing and Society : An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Djatmika. 2012. Perilaku Bahasa di Dalam Teks Kontrak dari Kaca Mata Linguistik Sistemik Fungsional. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Dreher, Mariam Jean, and Harry Singer. “Friendly Text and Text-Friendly Teachers.†Theory into Practice 24 No. 2 (1989): 98-104.
Eggins, Suzanne. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Pinter.
Freedman, Aviva. “Show and Tell? The Role of Explicit Teaching in the Learning of New Genres.†Research in the Teaching of English 27, No.3 (1993): 222-251.
Gallo, Gina, and Molly K. Ness. “Understanding the Text Genre Preferences of Third-Grade Readers.†Journal of Language and Literacy Education 9 No.2 (2013): 110-130.
Gee, J.P. 1992. The Social Mind: Language, Ideology, and Social Practice. New York: Bergin & Garvey.
Gerot, Linda, and Peter Wignel. 1995. Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: Gerd Stabler.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1994. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
Hauser, Robert M. et al. 2005. Measuring Literacy. Washington: The National Academics Press.
Hicks, Deborah. “Working Through Discourse Genre in School.†Research in the Teaching of English 31 (1997): 459-485.
Jurusan PGSD Universitas Negeri Jakarta. 2012. Modul Pendidikan Dan Latihan Profesi Guru Rayon 9 Universitas Negeri Jakarta. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. 2016. “Pemberian ruang Kreatif Bagi Guru.†Majalah Jendela, Juni.
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI. 2015. Buku Tematik Terpadu 2013: Tema 4. Peduli Lingkungan Sosial. Jakarta: Kementerian.
—. 2013. Materi Kuliah Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI.
Knopp, Peter, and Megan Watkins. 2005. Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Sydney: University of New South Wales.
Kompas. 2017. “Karakter Diperkuat.†Januari 27: 11.
Kompas. 2016. “Perekrutan Anak Jadi Teroris.†Desember 24: 1.
Lincoln, Y.S., and E.G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills : Sage Publication.
Maine, Fiona. 2015. Dialogic Readers: Children Talking andd Thinking Together about Visual Texts. New York: Routledge.
Matthiessen, Christian M.I.M.,Teruya, Kazuhiro, and Marvin Lam. 2010. Keyterms in Systemic Functional Linguistics. London : Continuum.
Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. n.d. Kemdikbud. Accessed May 28, 2017. www.kemdikbud.go.id/kemdikbud/ dokumen/Paparan/Paparan Mendikbud pada Workshop Pers.pdf.
Mohr, K.A.J. 2006. “Children's Choices for Recreational Reading: A Three-Part Investigation of Selection Preferences, Rationales, and Processes.†Journal of Literacy Research 38 No.1: 81-104.
Moss, B. “Making a Case and a Place for Effective Content Area Literacy Instruction in the Elementary Grades.†The Reading Teacher 59 No.1 (2005): 46-55.
Mulia, Vilya Lakstian Catra. “Motif Ketertarikan Pembaca: Tinjauan Aspek Internal Teks Hingga Metakognisi.†Jurnal Penelitian dan Kajian Keagamaan DIALOG (Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI) 39, No. 1 (2016): 81-88.
Mulia, Vilya Lakstian Catra. “The Contributions of Literacy Skills to National Development.†Leksema No. 2 (2016):111-118.
Nelson, Keith E, Ayhan Aksu-Koc, and Carolyn E., eds Johnson. 2001. Children's Language.
New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Salceda, Juan C. Ripoll, Gerardo Aguado Alonso, and Anny Patricia Castila Earls. “The Simple View of Reading in Elementary School: A Systematic Review.†Elsevier Espana (2013):17-31.
Santosa, Riyadi. 2011. Logika Wacana: Analisis Hubungan Konjungtif dengan Pendekatan Linguistik Sistemik Fungsional. Surakarta: LPP UNS dan UNS Press.
—. 2003. Semiotika Sosial : Pandangan Terhadap Bahasa. Surabaya : JP Press & Pustaka Eureka.
Spradley, J.P. 1980. Metode Etnografi. Translated by M.Z. Elizabeth. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
Sutopo, H.B. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar Teori dan Penerapannya dalam Penelitian. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.
Tankersley, Karen. 2003. The Threads of Reading: Strategies for Literacy Development. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Toledo, Piedad Fernandez. “Genre Analysis and Reading of English as a Foreign Language.†Journal of Pragmatics 37 (2005): 1059-1079.
Ventola, Eija. 1987. The Structure of Social Interaction: A Systemic Approach to the Semiotics of Service Encounters. London: Frances Pinter.
Wakil Menteri Pendidikan Republik Indonesia. n.d. Kemdikbud. Accessed May 28, 2017. www.kemdikbud.go.id/kemdikbud/dokumen/Paparan/Paparan Wamendik.pdf.
